Abstract
Therapists working with domestic violence are trained in many different theoretical models, each based on different values and assumptions. Each model raises different ethical dilemmas. In this paper, five theoretical approaches are evaluated in relation to the ethical principals of: respect for clients' autonomy: beneficence: non-maleficence: and justice. The inverse relationship between respect for autonomy and beneficence and non-maleficence is discussed. The hierarchical asymmetry involved in the therapeutic relationship is also explored.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 80-89 |
| Journal | Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Publication status | Published - 2001 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 5 Gender Equality -
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Health Counselling
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Working with domestic violence: Ethical dilemmas in five theoretical approaches'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver