Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Will bonded medical school places do more harm than good?

Joseph V Turner, Jeremy Brammer, Carl M Vogler

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

To the Editor, The smaller numbers of medical professionals choosing rural over metropolitan practice has inspired numerous strategies aimed at averting a potential healthcare crisis. Some are sound and reasonably successful while others such as the Federal Government's Bonded Medical Places (BMP) scheme appear entirely inappropriate. In return for entry to a medical course only, BMP students are contractually bound to service in an area of 'workforce shortage' for 6 years after graduation and attainment of their postgraduate qualifications. Support for BMP students is substantially less than that given to Medical Rural Bonded Scholarship students who receive financial aid and access to resources such as the Rural and Remote Medical Education Online platform.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)227-227
JournalAustralian Journal of Rural Health
Volume12
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2004

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Will bonded medical school places do more harm than good?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this