Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Why Richard Swinburne Won't 'Rot in Hell': A Defense of Tough-minded Theodicy

Peter Forrest

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In his recent paper in 'Sophia', 'Theodicy: The Solution to the Problem of Evil, or Part of the Problem?' Nick Trakakis endorses the position that theodicy, whether intellectually successful or not, is a morally obnoxious enterprise. My aim in this paper is to defend theodicy from this accusation. I concede that God the Creator is a moral monster by human standards and neither to be likened to a loving parent nor imitated. Nonetheless, God is morally perfect. What is abhorrent is not tough-minded theodicy but the hubris of imitating God. I further claim that it is no accident that the same sort of objection is made to act utilitarianism as to tough minded theodicy if the latter is misinterpreted as implying a guide for human action.
Original languageEnglish
JournalSophia
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Keywords

  • Philosophy of Religion

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why Richard Swinburne Won't 'Rot in Hell': A Defense of Tough-minded Theodicy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this