Abstract
The rhetoric of laying hen welfare influences people's emotions. Terms like 'cage-free' and 'caged' connotes 'liberty' or 'imprisonment', or simply, 'good' or 'bad' for the hen. Science can determine the risk that the chicken egg industry (hereafter industry) practices pose to hen welfare, but a social license to operate will ultimately determine whether these practices are acceptable. Science and social licence do not always align and can lead to serious negative welfare consequences for hens. Furnished cages were designed as a compromise between the welfare implications of conventional cage and free-range systems, but societal concerns may still occur on the rhetoric that any cage is still a 'cage'.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages | 248-248 |
| Publication status | Published - 2019 |
| Event | ISAE 2019: 53rd Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology - Radison BLU Royal Hotel, Bergen, Norway Duration: 5 Aug 2019 → 9 Aug 2019 |
Conference
| Conference | ISAE 2019: 53rd Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology |
|---|---|
| City | Bergen, Norway |
| Period | 5/08/19 → 9/08/19 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'What's in a name - the role of education and rhetoric in improving laying hen welfare'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver