Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

What's in a name? Preschoolers' noun learning performance in relation to their risk for reading disability

Megan L Gilliver, Brian J Byrne

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    6 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper reports the findings of an investigation aimed at gaining a clearer understanding of the nature of vocabulary difficulties associated with dyslexia and associated risk status. Three studies were conducted to examine preschoolers' access and mastery of syntactic- and phonological-based processes believed to support word learning. Results are reported for 82 participants whose (reading) risk status was assessed from a composite of measures known to be related to reading development. As expected, risk status correlated positively with participants' ability to recall the phonological form of novel nouns. No relationship was found between risk status and participants' use of syntactic form-class cues in interpreting the noun class of novel names in isolation. However, the ability to use form-class cues was impaired for at-risk participants on a task that required them to learn both the phonological form and noun class. Findings are discussed in relation to the suggestion that limitations in processing resources such as working memory rather than in the availability of language structures may be at the root of the reported poor performance by at-risk children on vocabulary and other linguistic measures.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)637-659
    JournalReading and Writing
    Volume22
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2009

    Keywords

    • Developmental Psychology and Ageing
    • Linguistic Processes (incl Speech Production and Comprehension)
    • Educational Psychology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'What's in a name? Preschoolers' noun learning performance in relation to their risk for reading disability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this