Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

'What is to count as knowledge': The evolving Directing program at the National Institute of Dramatic Art

Christopher Hay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

At the 2010 Australasian Association for Drama, Theatre and Performance Studies (ADSA) Conference, held at the Australian National University, staff and students from the National Institute of Dramatic Art (NIDA) presented some of their work for the first time. Their very attendance at the conference was a sign that NIDA was reaching out to the Theatre Studies Academy.2 It reflected the view on the part of some departments within NIDA, if not from the institution as a whole, that they do have a relationship with and a place within the Academy. At the 2010 conference, Karen Vickery, then Head of Performance Practices, gave a paper, and Egil Kipste, Head of Directing, led a session with three of the six students enrolled in the Graduate Diploma of Dramatic Art (Directing), demonstrating his particular application of the late Stanislavskian theory of Active Analysis (AA). Given that Sharon Carnicke, whose work is the most comprehensive articulation of that theory, had been the keynote speaker earlier that day, there was a - partly implicit - suggestion that the NIDA-led session was a practical demonstration of the theory-driven world which Carnicke represented.3
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)194-207
JournalAustralasian Drama Studies
Issue number60
Publication statusPublished - 31 Dec 2012

Keywords

  • Higher Education
  • Creative Arts, Media and Communication Curriculum and Pedagogy
  • Drama, Theatre and Performance Studies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of ''What is to count as knowledge': The evolving Directing program at the National Institute of Dramatic Art'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this