Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

What factors influence Australian media professionals’ level of agreement with guidelines for reporting suicide?

  • Jaelea Skehan
  • , Ross Tynan
  • , Renate Thienel
  • , Jane Pirkis
  • , Myfanwy Maple
  • , Brian Kelly

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examined whether Australian media professionals agree with guidelines for reporting suicide (Mindframe guidelines) and the factors that may influence their level of agreement. Participants completed an online survey to assess their level of agreement with Mindframe guidelines and to explore factors that might be associated with guideline agreement. These factors included demographic variables, suicide stigma, exposure to suicide, perceived strength of the evidence, personal use of guidelines, organisational compliance with guidelines and prior exposure to Mindframe. In total, 262 Australian media professionals from broadcast, print, digital and other media were recruited. Participants agreed with 15 of the 16 guideline statements, with linear regression showing that prior exposure to Mindframe was a significant predictor of agreement as was the perceived strength of the evidence, personal application of guidelines and stigma. Guidelines for reporting suicide should be enhanced by an active implementation strategy informed by knowledge and views of media professionals.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-16
JournalMedia International Australia
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 12 Jan 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What factors influence Australian media professionals’ level of agreement with guidelines for reporting suicide?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this