Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

What do We Want from a Theory of Epistemic Blame?

  • Adam Piovarchy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper identifies a number of questions that any plausible theory of epistemic blame ought to answer. What is epistemic blame? When is someone an appropriate target of epistemic blame? And what justifies engaging in epistemic blame? I argue that a number of problems arise when we try to answer these questions by using existing conceptions of moral blame. I then consider and reject Brown's [2020] belief-desire model of epistemic blame. Finally, I argue that an agency-cultivation model of moral responsibility is not only able to help us to develop a plausible theory of epistemic blame; it is particularly well-placed to do so.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)791-805
JournalAustralasian Journal of Philosophy
Volume99
Issue number4
Early online date26 Oct 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What do We Want from a Theory of Epistemic Blame?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this