TY - GEN
T1 - Welfare of Sequential Allocation Mechanisms for Indivisible Goods
AU - Aziz, Haris
AU - Walsh, Toby
AU - Xia, Lirong
AU - Kalinowski, Thomas
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Sequential allocation is a simple and attractive mechanism for the allocation of indivisible goods used in a number of real world settings. In sequential allocation, agents pick items according to a policy, the order in which agents take turns. Sequential allocation will return an allocation which is Pareto efficient – no agent can do better without others doing worse. However, sequential allocation may not return the outcome that optimizes the social welfare. We consider therefore the relationship between the welfare and the efficiency of the allocations returned by sequential allocation mechanisms. We then study some simple computational questions about what welfare is possible or necessary depending on the choice of policy. Over half the problems we study turn out to be tractable, and we give polynomial time algorithms to compute them. We also consider a novel control problem in which the Chair chooses a policy to improve social welfare. Again, many of the control problems we study turn out to be tractable, and our results give polynomial time algorithms. In this case, tractability is a good thing so that the Chair can improve the social welfare of the allocation.
AB - Sequential allocation is a simple and attractive mechanism for the allocation of indivisible goods used in a number of real world settings. In sequential allocation, agents pick items according to a policy, the order in which agents take turns. Sequential allocation will return an allocation which is Pareto efficient – no agent can do better without others doing worse. However, sequential allocation may not return the outcome that optimizes the social welfare. We consider therefore the relationship between the welfare and the efficiency of the allocations returned by sequential allocation mechanisms. We then study some simple computational questions about what welfare is possible or necessary depending on the choice of policy. Over half the problems we study turn out to be tractable, and we give polynomial time algorithms to compute them. We also consider a novel control problem in which the Chair chooses a policy to improve social welfare. Again, many of the control problems we study turn out to be tractable, and our results give polynomial time algorithms. In this case, tractability is a good thing so that the Chair can improve the social welfare of the allocation.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85013104315
U2 - 10.3233/978-1-61499-672-9-787
DO - 10.3233/978-1-61499-672-9-787
M3 - Conference contribution
SN - 9781614996712
SN - 9781614996729
VL - 285
T3 - Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications
SP - 787
EP - 794
BT - Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications
A2 - A Kaminka, Gal
A2 - Fox, Maria
A2 - Bouquet, Paolo
A2 - Hüllermeier, Eyke
A2 - Dignum, Virginia
A2 - Dignum, Frank
A2 - van Harmelen, Frank
PB - IOS Press
CY - Amsterdam, Netherlands
T2 - ECAI 2016: 22nd European Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Y2 - 29 August 2016 through 2 September 2016
ER -