Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Using technology to improve patient assessment and outcome evaluation

  • Debra Dunstan
  • , Suzie Tooth

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Until the recent widespread availability of modern communication technology, traditional paper mood monitoring data was plagued with limited compliance (approximately 11%) and inaccuracy. This restricted clinicians' capacity to meaningfully assess patient progress or evaluate their treatments by the preferred practice-based method: the single-case experimental design. A fundamental element of single-case methodology is the collection of repeated measures of behaviour or mood (typically daily or on several occasions per week) from which patterns and stability can be analysed using visual inspection. This data must also be collected in at least three phases: (i) baseline or pre-treatment; (ii) treatment; and (iii) post treatment or follow up - with a minimum of 5 data points per phase. Effective treatment is demonstrated when there is stability of symptoms at baseline (ie minimal slope), followed by a reduction in symptom severity during treatment (ie level), and the maintenance of gains at follow up.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberArticle No. 2048
Pages (from-to)1-3
JournalRural and Remote Health
Volume12
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2012

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Health, Clinical and Counselling Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Using technology to improve patient assessment and outcome evaluation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this