Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Using constructivism to inform tertiary chemistry pedagogy

Richard K Coll, Neil Taylor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

There have been many reports in the science education literature exhorting educators to teach from a constructivist view of learning. However, these reports typically fail to confront the difficulties associated with this stance. This review considers some of the implications and difficulties associated with a constructivist view of learning. The paper begins with an overview of paradigms and description of the origins of the constructivist paradigm that has become so dominant in science education research and scholarship, before discussing the principal criticisms of constructivism. The authors conclude that constructivism offers tertiary chemistry educators some valuable insights into classroom practice, but that appropriate pragmatism with regard to pedagogy is more important than adherence to any particular metaphysical belief system.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)215-226
JournalChemistry Education Research and Practice
Volume2
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2001

Keywords

  • Science, Technology and Engineering Curriculum and Pedagogy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Using constructivism to inform tertiary chemistry pedagogy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this