Abstract
There is considerable variation between Australian jurisdictions in their approach to urban water and waste-water pricing. Regardless of the explicit commitments of signatories to the National Water Initiative to 'best practice pricing' in 2004, there are no obvious signs that a common and efficient pricing regime is emerging. This paper considers one of the dimensions of urban water tariffs: the split between 'volumetric' and 'access' charges. Given the practical difficulties of implementing a 'first-best' solution, the preferences of household consumers are explored using choice modelling. Results show that household consumers would prefer a tariff regime that embodies greater emphasis on volumetric charges. This approach would also be more attractive on economic grounds compared to current regimes, with their high access charges and fixed waste-water tariffs.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 194-206 |
| Journal | Economic Papers |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Publication status | Published - 2008 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
Keywords
- Public Economics- Publically Provided Goods
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Urban Water Pricing: Practical Perspectives and Customer Preferences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver