Abstract
On 6 March 1996 the United States Court of Appeals handed down a significant decision in the matter of 'Compassion in Dying v State of Washington' (No 94-35534) (http://www.law.vill.edu/Fed-Ct/circuit/9th/opinions/9435534.htm). The case involved an application for a declaration that a Washington statute that prohibited any person assisting another to commit suicide was unconstitutional, to the extent that it applied to a physician assisting a terminally ill, mentally competent patient to commit suicide. By an eight-to-three majority, the Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit upheld the claim and struck down the legislation to the extent that it prohibited physician-assisted suicide. Although this case turned on relatively narrow grounds, in particular whether that part of the statute which prohibited a person who "aids" another to commit suicide was constitutional, the court's reasoning was much broader and will have future ramifications for the legalisation of physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 308-310 |
| Journal | Journal of Law and Medicine |
| Volume | 3 |
| Publication status | Published - 1996 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Criminal Law and Procedure
- Law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'United States recognition of the right to die'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver