Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Understanding why peri-urban residents do not report wild dog impacts: an audience segmentation approach

  • Donald W Hine
  • , Lynette J McLeod
  • , Patricia M Please

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Peri-urban populations are diverse, with residents possessing a broad range of values, knowledge and skills related to managing invasive pests. In this article, we employed the COM-B behavior change model and audience segmentation analysis to identify the main barriers that prevent Gold Coast peri-urban residents from reporting wild dog impacts to local government. Participants (n = 383) responded to a random digit dial phone survey that assessed their capability, opportunity and motivation to report wild dogs and their impacts to local government. Audience segmentation analysis identified two types of non-reporters: (a) Reluctant – perceived no benefits of reporting, it took too much effort, and believed dogs should be left alone – and (b) Receptive – acknowledged wild dogs were a threat and understood the benefits of reporting. We describe how segmentation analysis can be used to develop interventions specifically tailored to the needs of each type of non-reporter.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)355-371
JournalHuman Dimensions of Wildlife
Volume25
Issue number4
Early online date1 Mar 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding why peri-urban residents do not report wild dog impacts: an audience segmentation approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this