Abstract
Psychologists’ adherence with evidence-based guidelines based on the biopsychosocial premise in the management of musculoskeletal injuries is influenced by the actions by General Practitioners (GPs), insurers, and injured patients’ actions. For data collection, we interviewed GPs (n = 6), insurers (n = 6), and injured people (n = 15) from the two personal injury compensation schemes in New South Wales. Thematic analysis yielded the following: GPs were reticent to access psychological services that represented a poor fit between their practice and treatment guidelines, insurers lacked trust in the validity of “secondary psychological injury” claims’. Injured peoples’ willingness to engage with treatment was impaired by a poor fit between the treatment guidelines and their experience of insurers’ and psychologists’ practices.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 47-62 |
| Journal | The Australian Journal of Rehabilitation Counselling |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | 29 Oct 2019 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2019 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding the barriers affecting psychologists' adherence to evidence-based treatment guidelines from a stakeholder standpoint'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver