Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Understanding and promoting adoption of conservation practices by rural landholders

David J Pannell, Graham R Marshall, Neil Barr, Allan Curtis, Frank Vanclay, Roger Wilkinson

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearch

Abstract

Research on the adoption of rural innovations is reviewed and interpreted through a cross-disciplinary lens to provide practical guidance for research, extension and policy relating to conservation practices. Adoption of innovations by landholders is presented as a dynamic learning process. Adoption depends on a range of personal, social, cultural and economic factors, as well as on characteristics of the innovation itself. Adoption occurs when the landholder perceives that the innovation in question will enhance the achievement of their personal goals. A range of goals is identifiable among landholders, including economic, social and environmental goals. Innovations are more likely to be adopted when they have a high 'relative advantage' (perceived superiority to the idea or practice that it supersedes), and when they are readily trialable (easy to test and learn about before adoption). Non-adoption or low adoption of a number of conservation practices is readily explicable in terms of the failure of these practices to provide a relative advantage (particularly in economic terms) or a range of difficulties that landholders may have in testing them.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationChanging Land Management: Adoption of New Practices by Rural Landholders
EditorsDavid Pannell, Frank Vanclay
Place of PublicationCollingwood, Australia
PublisherCSIRO Publishing
Pages11-38
Edition1
ISBN (Print)9780643102279, 9780643101739, 9780643100381
Publication statusPublished - 31 Dec 2011

Keywords

  • Environmental Management
  • Environment and Resource Economics
  • Natural Resource Management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding and promoting adoption of conservation practices by rural landholders'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this