Abstract
Political sociology and state theory display two characteristics common across the social sciences. First, the various schools or strands work in relative isolation from each other. Even the terms 'political sociology' and 'state theory' mark these differences: the former generally codes a broadly Weberian approach, the latter a neo-Marxist one. Secondly, a lot of work in this area is concerned with identifying, generally relatively recent, transformations of 'the state,' frequently in epochal terms. This paper looks at some of the conceptual confusions that underly this state of affairs and seeks to distinguish more clearly between state and regime.
| Translated title of the contribution | The transformation of the state or a change of regime? Some confusion in theory and sociology of the state |
|---|---|
| Original language | French |
| Pages (from-to) | 537-557 |
| Journal | Revue Francaise de Sociologie |
| Volume | 52 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2011 |
Keywords
- Political Theory and Political Philosophy
- Social Theory
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The transformation of the state or a change of regime? Some confusion in theory and sociology of the state'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver