Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Towards de-cold-war politics: Nationalism, democracy and new politics of/for education in Japan

  • Keita Takayama

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Almost 30 years have passed since the 'end' of cold-war geopolitics, marked by the demise of communism, the breakup of the Soviet Union and the removal of the Berlin Wall. There was much celebration of the global spread of capitalist economy and the universalisation of liberal democracy as brining progress all around the world. The declaration of 'the end of history' - or the inevitable 'triumph' of liberal capitalist democracy - served to justify the dominating role that the United States played in world political affairs thereafter. In this so-called 'post-political' world, it was believed that the antagonism between the left and Right in the dmoestic political scene would soon disappear, and ideological conflicts would be replaced by consensual or dialogic liberal politica (cf. Mouffe 2005). And yet, the spell of cold-war politics continues to shape politics and subjectivies in Asia (Chen 2010).
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationEducation and Political Subjectivities in Neoliberal Times and Places: Emergences of norms and possibilities
EditorsEva Reimers, Lena Martinsson
Place of PublicationNew York, United States of America
PublisherRoutledge
Pages68-85
Edition1
ISBN (Print)9781138962880, 9781315659138
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Publication series

NameRoutledge Research in Education Policy and Politics

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • Comparative and Cross-Cultural Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Towards de-cold-war politics: Nationalism, democracy and new politics of/for education in Japan'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this