Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Towards a multi-dimensional indicator to understand equity in education: Introducing the Equity Raw-Score Matrix

Julie Willems

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearch

Abstract

Online learning has been touted as one means by which disadvantage for participation in higher education can be overcome. A frequent argument for the provision of online learning is the improvement of equity for those previously excluded from higher education 'due to location, family responsibilities, or disability' (Bishop, 2002, p. 231). However, the notion of equity in educational participation can be conceptualised in different ways. McIntyre et al. (2004, pp. 18-19) delineate five perceptions of equity on the basis of the underlying social paradigm upon which they are based: the conservative view of equity (opportunities are available to every individual in a society, and thus no additional equity strategies are necessary); the neo-conservative view (each individual should be able to realise their economic potential which is enabled by access to courses); the neo-liberalist view (social exclusion is the breakdown between an individual and society, thus equity strategies need to manage diversity); the liberal and liberal humanist view (the education system needs to be accessible to all by the redistribution of resources and the removal of any barriers that may be preventing successful participation); and finally, the socialist or radical socialist view of equity (non-dominant groups should be supported and resourced for social justice). In this paper, equity is viewed to as a social justice issue. That is, educational disadvantage should be acknowledged, and students experiencing disadvantage need to be supported in order to achieve educational outcomes.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationLearning, Teaching and Social Justice in Higher Education
EditorsNoah Riseman, Sue Rechter, Ellen Warne
Place of PublicationMelbourne, Australia
PublisherUniversity of Melbourne, eScholarship Research Centre and Australian Catholic University, School of Arts and Sciences
Pages1-16
Edition1
ISBN (Print)9781921775284
Publication statusPublished - 2010

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities

Keywords

  • Higher Education
  • Human Rights and Justice Issues

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Towards a multi-dimensional indicator to understand equity in education: Introducing the Equity Raw-Score Matrix'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this