Tong quan phe binh sinh thai Dong Nam A: Huong toi mot nganh nghien cuu van hoc moi truong xuyen quoc gia

Phai thu nhan cai nhin tong quan ma toi dua ra o day chi la mot trong so rat nhieu dieu co the viet ra. No duoc thuat lai chu yeu dua tren mot cuon sach vua duoc xuat ban gan day la Phe binh sinh thai Dong Nam A, do nha xuat ban Lexington phat hanh. Cuon sach nay, thuc chat, la mot each tiep can co y chung cat Dong Nam A thanh mot hinh thai chung co the thong hieu duoc qua viec quan sat nhung duong bien chinh tri cua no, ma mot vai trong so nhung duong bien ay da duoc tao thanh tu thoi thuc dan, trong khi mot vai trong so do lai tuong ung voi nhung duong bien tu nhien cua nhung dong song, nhung vung bien, nhung day nui doi; va tat ca chung lai cung tao thanh nhung duong phan ranh gioi cac khu vuc van hoa, ngon ngu va sinh thai khac nhau. Chang han, trong cuon Nghien cuu Dong Nam A xuat ban lan dau tien nam 1971, hai nha su hoc David Chandler va William Roff cung voi nhung cong su cua ho da luu y rang, thuat ngu Dong Nam A chi bat dau duoc su dung pho bien nhu la mot dinh danh dia ly sau cuoc chien tranh Viet Nam nhung nam 60-70 the ki XX.

This paper addresses the lack of emphasis on Southeast Asia in Anglocentric ecocritical scholarship. Despite the rich environmental traditions of Southeast Asian literature, few studies in English have been published. In order for ecocriticism to grow in Southeast Asia, scholars within the region should become knowledgeable of the practical possibilities of ecocriticism that could benefit their local communities. In embracing possibilities for activism and engagement, as well as a transnational outlook, ecocriticism will achieve greater relevance to human and nonhuman communities in Southeast Asia and elsewhere. Given the extraordinary pressures on environments throughout Asia, and especially in the Southeast region, community-based ecocritical scholarship is urgent.