Abstract
Introduction: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is a tool that supports personalized dosing, but its role for liposomal amphotericin B (L-amb) is unclear. This systematic review assessed the evidence for L-amb TDM in children.
Objectives: To evaluate the concentration–efficacy relationship, concentration–toxicity relationship and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) variability of L-amb in children.
Methods: We systematically reviewed PubMed and Embase databases following PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies included L-amb PK/PD studies in children aged 0–18 years. Review articles, case series of <five patients, editorials and animal studies were excluded. Quality assessment was performed using the Critical Appraisal of Clinical Pharmacokinetics tool. The concentration–efficacy and concentration–toxicity relationships and PK/PD variability were analysed.
Results: In total, 4220 studies were screened; 6 were included, presenting data on 195 children. Invasive candidiasis and aspergillosis were the two most common infections treated with L-amb. Studies showed significant PK variability due to age (mean age ranged from 14 days to 17 years), body weight, non-linear PK and changes in the volume of distribution. Limited evidence supported a peak concentration/MIC (Cmax/MIC) of 25–50 for optimal efficacy and an AUC24 of >600 mg·h/L for nephrotoxicity. L-amb doses of 2.5–10 mg/kg/day were reported to achieve Cmax/MIC > 25 using an MIC of 1 mg/L.
Conclusions: While significant PK variability was observed in children, evidence to support routine L-amb TDM was limited. Further studies on efficacy and toxicity benefits are required before routine TDM of L-amb can be recommended.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 703-711 |
| Journal | Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy |
| Volume | 79 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 30 Apr 2024 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Therapeutic drug monitoring of liposomal amphotericin B in children. Are we there yet? A systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver