Abstract
The Unnamable is more than difficult, it gives voice to the new. Maurice Blanchot's theory of the work and the neutral provides a significant contribution to Beckett criticism because through these ideas, he responds to Beckett's capacity for invention. Blanchot believes that the work, as a autonomous object, is borne out of difficulty. Beckett's writing is not only exemplary of this, it plays out the suffering and frustration of transforming words into ideas, ideas into stories and stories into memories. Beckett goes further than illustrate philosophical concepts, he dramatises them. The Unnamable gives them voice, breath, sound and silence.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | After Beckett = D'après Beckett |
| Editors | Anthony Uhlmann, Sjef Houppermans, Bruno Clément |
| Place of Publication | Amsterdam, Netherlands |
| Publisher | Rodopi |
| Pages | 293-305 |
| Edition | 1 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9042019727 |
| Publication status | Published - 2004 |
Keywords
- Literary Studies
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Work, The Neutral and The Unnamable'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver