Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The role of dialect exposure in receptive multilingualism

  • Charlotte Gooskens
  • , Wilbert Heeringa

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Previous investigations of inter-Scandinavian intelligibility have shown that, in general, Norwegians are better at understanding the closely related languages Danish and Swedish than Danes and Swedes are at understanding Norwegian. This asymmetry is often explained by the strong position that dialects hold in Norway as opposed to in Denmark and Sweden. In Norway, the general public is more exposed to language variation than in Sweden and Denmark. Due to this exposure Norwegians are assumed to have higher language awareness and more possibilities for linguistic transfer than Swedes and Danes. This could make it easier for them to understand closely related language varieties. The aim of the present investigation is to get an answer to the question whether Norwegians are better at understanding Nordic varieties relative to linguistic distances than Danes. If it is indeed the case that Norwegians have more language awareness, we would expect them to be better than Danes at understanding varieties with the same linguistic distance to their native variety. Our results show that Norwegians are generally better at understanding Nordic language varieties than Danes are. However, this can be explained by linguistic distances and knowledge of the language varieties in the test. No evidence was found for more general language awareness among Norwegians than among Danes.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)247-271
    JournalApplied Linguistics Review
    Volume5
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Keywords

    • Language in Time and Space (incl Historical Linguistics, Dialectology)

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The role of dialect exposure in receptive multilingualism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this