Abstract
This paper is based on research conducted with indigenous students at a university in the Northern Territory. It examines cross cultural theories of education which explain the problems of teaching and learning in indigenous contexts in terms of the cultural mismatch between the home and school environment These theories position the teacher as the condition of knowledge and learning in so far as he or she is responsible for transmitting the knowledge and skills to students. The teacher's methodology becomes the means through which students learn. But in the context of indigenous education, in positioning indigenous students in relation to a non-indigenous teacher's methodology, cross cultural theories of education unconsciously perpetuate an unequal historical relation in the university classroom. I conclude that good teaching and learning at university are not only a consequence of a good methodology but the product of an unconscious influence of the teacher's style upon the student; the crucial factor that brings the two together is how the pedagogue speaks.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 282-294 |
| Journal | Australian Journal of Education |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Publication status | Published - 2004 |
Keywords
- Education Assessment and Evaluation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The reproduction of historical relations in the crosscultural classroom at university'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver