Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Relation Between Peak Response Magnitudes and Agreement in Diagnoses Obtained From Two Different Phallometric Tests for Pedophilia

Amy Lykins, James Cantor, Michael Kuban, Thomas Blak, Robert Dickey, Philip Klassen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Phallometric testing is widely considered the best psychophysiological procedure for assessing erotic preferences in men. Researchers have differed, however, on the necessity of setting some minimum criterion of penile response for ascertaining the interpretability of a phallometric test result. Proponents of a minimum criterion have generally based their view on the intuitive notion that "more is better" rather than any formal demonstration of this. The present study was conducted to investigate whether there is any empirical evidence for this intuitive notion, by examining the relation between magnitude of penile response and the agreement in diagnoses obtained in two test sessions using different laboratory stimuli. The results showed that examinees with inconsistent diagnoses responded less on both tests and that examinees with inconsistent diagnoses responded less on the second test after controlling for their response on the first test. Results also indicated that at response levels less than 1 cm³, diagnostic consistency was no better than chance, supporting the establishment of a minimum response level criterion.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)42-57
JournalSexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Health, Clinical and Counselling Psychology
  • Forensic Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Relation Between Peak Response Magnitudes and Agreement in Diagnoses Obtained From Two Different Phallometric Tests for Pedophilia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this