Abstract
This paper questions the dominant arguments that currently frame debate over the political ineffectiveness of the higher education lobby in Australia. Public choice theory is used to advance a more complex hypothesis that takes into account dramatic changes to the political environment over recent decades. This is tested against interview data from policy actors and vice-chancellors.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 475-487 |
| Journal | Higher Education Research and Development |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2010 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
Keywords
- Educational Administration, Management and Leadership
- Higher Education
- Education Policy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The new politics of Australian higher education: why universities get rumbled in the budget'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver