Abstract
In 1817, Governor Macquarie alleged that Samuel Marsden was an especially severe magistrate, a claim widely repeated in subsequent histories. And yet, if measured against other magistrates in the Macquarie era, Marsden sentenced convicts to a flogging less frequently and ordered typical numbers of lashes. The myth of Marsden as the flogging parson developed in the writing of Marsden's political enemies, grounded in his popular reputation as a brute and a hypocrite. In a context of growing humanitarian and criminological opposition to corporal punishment, Marsden's incongruous responsibilities to preach and punish convicts became a scandalous anachronism.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 486-501 |
| Journal | Australian Historical Studies |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Early online date | 26 Oct 2017 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2017 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Courts and Sentencing
- British History
- Australian History (excl. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander History)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Myth of the Flogging Parson: Samuel Marsden and Severity of Punishment in the Age of Reform'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver