Abstract
The 'Health Practitioner Regulation National Law Act 2009' (Part 8, Sections 140 and 141) enshrines mandatory notification in the new national registration framework. As registered health practitioners, clinician-researchers are bound by the notification requirements. This raises the question of whether mandatory notification has implications for observational research in health services that is conducted by clinician-researchers. In particular, how likely is it that these requirements will lead to reclassification of one's observations from "research data" to "notification evidence"?
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 54-54 |
| Journal | Medical Journal of Australia |
| Volume | 195 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - 2011 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Health Care Administration
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The implications of mandatory notification for clinician-researchers involved in observational research in health services'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver