Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Impact of the State on Institutional Differentiation in New Zealand

A Codling, VL Meek

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    The New Zealand higher education system is a small but complexarrangement of colleges, polytechnics, institutes of technology anduniversities that on the surface appears to display admirable diversity for a system that serves around four million people.However, while major legislation introduced in 1990 formalised four distinct types of public tertiary institution, in practical terms, the last 12 years have been characterised by the progressive convergence of institutional types.Through a brief historical review and the analysis of institutionalmission and values statements, and published performance indicators, this article explores and illustrates different perspectives of diversity amongst New Zealand higher education institutions which have converged over the last 12 years. This convergence occurred during an extended period of deregulation in which the market has acted as a surrogate for overt government policy in shaping the direction of the system and the institutions within it. Even recent formal government policy supporting the development of strong and distinct institutional identities and greater differentiation amongst tertiary institutions has been thwarted by the same government's intervention to prevent system change by limiting the number of universities in the country.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)83-98
    JournalHigher Education Management and Policy
    Volume15
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished - 2003

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 4 - Quality Education
      SDG 4 Quality Education

    Keywords

    • Education Policy

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The Impact of the State on Institutional Differentiation in New Zealand'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this