Abstract
Much debated in the early 2000s, the productivist/post-productivist transition is revisited from an Antipodean perspective from where it was variously both strongly adopted and vigorously contested as a theorization of rural change. The context in which the terminology of productivism and post-productivism, particularly the various classes of the former, appeared is discussed. Although multifunctionalism is endorsed, the persistence of productivism, especially in nascent forms - protectionist productivism, competitive productivism and super-productivism - is noted. We argue that for an enduring research agenda on multifunctionality to emerge a truly multi-scalar conceptual schema, with accompanying revised terminology, needs to be developed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 621-635 |
| Journal | Progress in Human Geography |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2015 |
Keywords
- Human Geography
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The fall and rise of agricultural productivism? An Antipodean viewpoint'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver