Abstract
A number of passages in ancient texts suggest that for much of the archaic and classical periods Eleia was considered a sacred and inviolable land, immune from invasion. While contemporary scholars, referring to the work of Georg Busolt and Eduard Meyer, reject the testimony of Polybios, Strabo, Diodoros and Phlegon in regard to the Eleian 'asylia', a careful examination of Busoult's arguments reveals that they are highly speculative. Meyer offers little in addition. Instances of Eleian warfare in the ancient sources, furthermore, are not the conclusive evidence against the 'asylia' that they appear at first glance.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 413-430 |
| Journal | Hermes: Zeitschrift für klassische Philologie |
| Volume | 139 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Publication status | Published - 2011 |
Keywords
- Humanities and Social Sciences Curriculum and Pedagogy (excl Economics, Business and Management)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Eleian 'Asylia': A Defence of the Ancient Texts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver