Abstract
This paper describes teaching methods used for delivery of the MLMs, as well as evaluation methods and results. However, it also raises the critical question of whether multi-professional education (MPE) will be effective in promoting long-term changes in the graduates' approaches to their professional practice and whether the health outcomes of patients will be improved. This same question occurs repeatedly in the literature and there appears to be wide acknowledgement that there is a need for more substantial evidence of the benefits in terms of better practice outcomes.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages | 1-10 |
| Publication status | Published - 2005 |
| Event | NHRC 8: 8th National Rural Health Conference - Central to Health: Sustaining Well-Being in Remote and Rural Australia - Alice Springs, Australia Duration: 10 Mar 2005 → 13 Mar 2005 |
Conference
| Conference | NHRC 8: 8th National Rural Health Conference - Central to Health: Sustaining Well-Being in Remote and Rural Australia |
|---|---|
| City | Alice Springs, Australia |
| Period | 10/03/05 → 13/03/05 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Public Health and Health Services
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The challenge of evaluating rural undergraduate multi-professional education'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver