Abstract
This review discusses several kinds of linguistic generalizations that pose a challenge for the constructionist approach to linguistic generalizations advocated by Adele Goldberg. It is difficult to see, for example, how such an account can explain the wide-ranging linguistic phenomena governed by structural properties, such as c-command, or semantic properties, such as downward entailment. We also argue against Goldberg's rejection of formal semantics in favour of an account of meaning based primarily on information structure and discourse function.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages | 145-155 |
| Volume | 20 |
| No. | 1 |
| Specialist publication | Cognitive Linguistics |
| Publication status | Published - 2008 |
Keywords
- Linguistic Processes (incl Speech Production and Comprehension)
- Linguistic Structures (incl Grammar, Phonology, Lexicon, Semantics)
- Logic
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The case of the missing generalizations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver