Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Boomerang Paradox, Part II: Policy Prescriptions for Reducing Fuel Poverty in Australia

Paul Simshauser, Timothy Nelson, Thao Doan

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    31 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    An analysis suggests that incremental GST collections from electricity accounts are more than adequate to eliminate fuel poverty. This could facilitate access to efficient electric appliances and in-home displays for fuel-poor households. The widespread shift to smart meters and time-of-use tariff structures is also required to address the source of the problem - rising peak demand.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)63-75
    JournalThe Electricity Journal
    Volume24
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
      SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy

    Keywords

    • Environment and Resource Economics
    • Industry Economics and Industrial Organisation
    • Public Economics- Publically Provided Goods

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The Boomerang Paradox, Part II: Policy Prescriptions for Reducing Fuel Poverty in Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this