Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Stress At Work: To Tell or Not to Tell?

Mark Lunney

Research output: Contribution to journalOther

Abstract

In 'Koehler v Cerebos (Aust) Ltd' (2005) 79 ALJR 845, the plaintiff sued her defendant employer on the ground that the workload required of her under her contract of employment was excessive and resulted in her suffering a depressive psychiatric illness. A unanimous High Court of Australia rejected her claim on the basis that the psychiatric injury she suffered was not a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the employer's conduct. Although such a result is defensible on the facts, the law relating to the liability of an employer for an employee's psychiatric injury remains somewhat uncertain.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)75-77
JournalUniversity of New England Law Journal
Volume2
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Keywords

  • Tort Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Stress At Work: To Tell or Not to Tell?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this