Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Social Desirability Bias and the Prevalence of Self-Reported Conservation Behaviour Among Farmers

  • Geoff Kaine
  • , Vic Wright

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Agriculture is recognised globally as a major contributor to environmental degradation, habitat loss, and climate change. Having reliable data on the conservation behaviour of farmers is crucial to the evaluation of policy measures intended to reduce the harmful environmental effects of agriculture and promote sustainability. In responses to direct questions about conservation behaviours, the biasing of responses to appear more socially responsible has been found to be commonplace. From a policy perspective, the degree to which farmers might overstate the frequency with which they engage in behaviours that are desirable from a conservation perspective and understate the frequency with which they engage in behaviours that are undesirable because of social desirability bias is a matter of practical importance. In this paper we use, for the first time, crosswise questioning to investigate the influence of social desirability bias on self-reporting of conservation behaviour by farmers in New Zealand. We found that the effect of social desirability bias on self-reports of conservation behaviour by farmers in New Zealand is small. Consequently, self-reporting of conservation behaviour by farmers may be relied on when evaluating policies intended to promote sustainable development.

Original languageEnglish
Article number9658
Pages (from-to)1-12
JournalSustainability
Volume16
Issue number22
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Nov 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Social Desirability Bias and the Prevalence of Self-Reported Conservation Behaviour Among Farmers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this