Abstract
Although issues of paternity are usually uncontroversial, the use of artificial insemination has required the law to develop rules to determine who is to be considered the father of a child. This paper will look at paternity and the important, but misplaced focus that the law places on sexual intercourse in deciding who should have paternal rights and responsibilities. It is argued that the law could reasonably chose between one of three reasonable options for defining who is the father of a child, they are the genetic father, the social father or accept that children have more than one father. Under current law a child can have only one father but determining who the 'father' is depends on none of these factors, instead the laws focus is on whether or not the child was conceived following an act of sexual intercourse or artificial insemination. It is argued that the current approach is misplaced and unreasonable. In developing this argument I will explore the logical implications of the various legal options that available.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Publication status | Published - 2006 |
| Event | ALTA 2005: 60th Annual Australasian Law Teachers Association Conference: 'One Law for All?' - University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand Duration: 5 Jul 2005 → 8 Jul 2005 |
Conference
| Conference | ALTA 2005: 60th Annual Australasian Law Teachers Association Conference: 'One Law for All?' |
|---|---|
| City | Hamilton, New Zealand |
| Period | 5/07/05 → 8/07/05 |
Keywords
- Family Law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Should paternity be linked to sexual intercourse? Presented at this conference under the title: There's more to being a father than sex'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver