Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Should Angus Breeders Live-Animal Ultrasound Scan For Intramuscular Fat In The Genomics Era?

Research output: Contribution to journal › Conference article › peer-review

Abstract

Accuracy of selection and response to selection for the breeding objective traits of carcase IMF, AUS-MEAT marbling score and MSA marbling score were generated by modelling seventeen different phenotyping and genotyping scenarios using selection index theory. The data used in the study was produced from the Angus Sire Benchmarking Program (ASBP). The study showed that the highest rates of selection accuracy and response (ΔG) were achieved through using a combina-tion of ultrasound scan phenotyping for intramuscular fat (IMF) and genotyping with a reference population including carcase IMF and marbling score phenotypes. For phenotype only scenarios, Central Ultrasound Processing (CUP) showed substantially higher response to selection and accuracy of selection to the Esaote Aquila ultrasound system (PIE) for IMF resulting from the higher herita-bility and stronger genetic correlations to the direct carcase breeding objective traits. The value of ultrasound scan phenotyping diminishes as the prediction accuracy of the genomic breeding value (GBV) increases. The GBV only scenario surpassed phenotype only scenarios once GBV prediction accuracy was greater than 59% when compared to CUP IMF phenotyping and 46% when compared to the PIE IMF phenotyping.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)496-499
JournalProceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics
Volume23
Publication statusPublished - 2019
EventAAABG 2019: 23rd Conference of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics - University of New England, Armidale, Australia
Duration: 27 Oct 2019 → 1 Nov 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Should Angus Breeders Live-Animal Ultrasound Scan For Intramuscular Fat In The Genomics Era?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this