Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Should Agriculture be Exempt from Trade Policy Reforms in South Asia?

Sumudu Perera, Mahinda Siriwardana, Stuart Mounter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Contracting parties to the Agreement on South Asian Free Trade Area (SAFTA) are committed to trade liberalization within a fixed time frame. Most contracting parties have kept agriculture out of their tariff liberalization commitments. A key question therefore is: should agriculture receive dispensation given the sector's important contribution to South Asia's economic structure? An enhanced multi-household framework within a multi-country computable general equilibrium (CGE) approach was used to assess the impacts on trade flows, government fiscal revenues and income distribution among households in countries that are contracting parties to SAFTA, assuming full trade liberalization and trade liberalization with the protection of the agricultural sector. The results indicate that, although both policies would facilitate economic growth and lead to a reduction in income disparity among household groups in all South Asian countries, the overall welfare gains would be greater under full trade liberalization. Hence, the removal of agricultural sector tariffs should be an important consideration in future SAFTA discussions; such a step would be a principal means for strengthening intraregional trade.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)67-106
JournalAsia-Pacific Development Journal
Volume21
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2014

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
    SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth

Keywords

  • International Economics and International Finance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Should Agriculture be Exempt from Trade Policy Reforms in South Asia?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this