Abstract
In 2008 internationally acclaimed Australian photographer Bill Henson planned to exhibit some of his work at a Sydney Gallery. This included photographs of a naked 12-year-old child. When one image was used in publicity to promote the exhibition it came to the attention of the organizer of a child advocacy group who complained to police that the image constituted child pornography. The subsequent seizing of the images gave rise to a community debate about artistic freedom, what constitutes child pornography and the capacity of children to consent. Although these events coincidentally occurred at the same time as a Senate inquiry into the sexualization of children in the media, the issue of childhood sexuality was a muted aspect of the ensuing public debate.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 290-311 |
| Journal | Sexualities |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2011 |
Keywords
- Law and Society
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Sexualizing the child: The strange case of Bill Henson, his 'absolutely revolting' images and the law of childhood innocence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver