Abstract
As part of the broader Queensland local government amalgamation programme, in 2008 Noosa Shire Council, Caloundra City Council and Maroochy Shire Council were compulsorily merged into a new Sunshine Coast Regional Council. Five years on, unyielding public opposition and a new Queensland Government has secured de-amalgamation of Noosa Shire from the Sunshine Coast Regional Council. Given the almost complete absence of empirical literature on municipal de-amalgamation, the Noosa case provides a rare opportunity to empirically assess a de-amalgamation process. Accordingly, this paper provides a critical evaluation of the de-amalgamation analysis prepared by the Queensland Treasury Corporation. Far from placating residents, the de-amalgamation plans are likely to provoke further acrimony due not only to equity problems, but also a lack of democratic representation on key decision-making bodies. On a broader level, this case study serves as a template for the theory and practice associated with any municipal de-amalgamation - either in Australia or abroad.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 213-220 |
| Journal | Public Money and Management |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2014 |
Keywords
- Public Administration
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Separation anxiety: an empirical evaluation of the Australian Sunshine Coast Regional Council de-amalgamation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver