Securing Personal Input From Individuals Aging with Intellectual Disability: Do Differing Methodologies Produce Equivalent Information?

Stuart Wark; Miranda Cannon; Marie Knox; Marie Parmenter; Rafat Hussain; Matthew Janicki; Chez Leggatt-Cook; Meaghan Edwards; Trevor Parmenter

Securing Personal Input From Individuals Aging with Intellectual Disability: Do Differing Methodologies Produce Equivalent Information?

Stuart Wark
, Miranda Cannon
, Marie Knox
, Marie Parmenter
, Rafat Hussain
, Matthew Janicki
, Chez Leggatt-Cook
, Meaghan Edwards
, Trevor Parmenter

School of Rural Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Research is limited on whether differing methodologies for facilitating personal contributions from individuals aging with intellectual disability produce equivalent knowledge outcomes. Two matched purpose-developed tools examined five quality-of-life domains. Results showed substantial variance between qualitative interview responses and Likert-scale data, and indicate validity concerns for using either methodology in isolation.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	28-48
Journal	Review of Disability Studies
Volume	12
Issue number	2&3
Publication status	Published - 2016

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

Care for Disabled
Aged Health Care
Public Health and Health Services

Access to Document

Handle.net

Persistent link

Cite this

Wark, S., Cannon, M., Knox, M., Parmenter, M., Hussain, R., Janicki, M., Leggatt-Cook, C., Edwards, M., & Parmenter, T. (2016). Securing Personal Input From Individuals Aging with Intellectual Disability: Do Differing Methodologies Produce Equivalent Information? Review of Disability Studies, 12(2&3), 28-48. http://rdsjournal.org/index.php/journal/article/view/571/1678

@article{a56d9ab0f8b94c5da1310165a41a2e6c,

title = "Securing Personal Input From Individuals Aging with Intellectual Disability: Do Differing Methodologies Produce Equivalent Information?",

abstract = "Research is limited on whether differing methodologies for facilitating personal contributions from individuals aging with intellectual disability produce equivalent knowledge outcomes. Two matched purpose-developed tools examined five quality-of-life domains. Results showed substantial variance between qualitative interview responses and Likert-scale data, and indicate validity concerns for using either methodology in isolation.",

keywords = "Care for Disabled, Aged Health Care, Public Health and Health Services",

author = "Stuart Wark and Miranda Cannon and Marie Knox and Marie Parmenter and Rafat Hussain and Matthew Janicki and Chez Leggatt-Cook and Meaghan Edwards and Trevor Parmenter",

year = "2016",

language = "English",

volume = "12",

pages = "28--48",

journal = "Review of Disability Studies",

issn = "1553-3697",

publisher = "University of Hawai'i at Manoa",

number = "2\&3",

}

Wark, S, Cannon, M, Knox, M, Parmenter, M, Hussain, R, Janicki, M, Leggatt-Cook, C, Edwards, M & Parmenter, T 2016, 'Securing Personal Input From Individuals Aging with Intellectual Disability: Do Differing Methodologies Produce Equivalent Information?', Review of Disability Studies, vol. 12, no. 2&3, pp. 28-48. <http://rdsjournal.org/index.php/journal/article/view/571/1678>

TY - JOUR

T1 - Securing Personal Input From Individuals Aging with Intellectual Disability

T2 - Do Differing Methodologies Produce Equivalent Information?

AU - Wark, Stuart

AU - Cannon, Miranda

AU - Knox, Marie

AU - Parmenter, Marie

AU - Hussain, Rafat

AU - Janicki, Matthew

AU - Leggatt-Cook, Chez

AU - Edwards, Meaghan

AU - Parmenter, Trevor

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Research is limited on whether differing methodologies for facilitating personal contributions from individuals aging with intellectual disability produce equivalent knowledge outcomes. Two matched purpose-developed tools examined five quality-of-life domains. Results showed substantial variance between qualitative interview responses and Likert-scale data, and indicate validity concerns for using either methodology in isolation.

AB - Research is limited on whether differing methodologies for facilitating personal contributions from individuals aging with intellectual disability produce equivalent knowledge outcomes. Two matched purpose-developed tools examined five quality-of-life domains. Results showed substantial variance between qualitative interview responses and Likert-scale data, and indicate validity concerns for using either methodology in isolation.

KW - Care for Disabled

KW - Aged Health Care

KW - Public Health and Health Services

M3 - Article

SN - 1553-3697

VL - 12

SP - 28

EP - 48

JO - Review of Disability Studies

JF - Review of Disability Studies

IS - 2&3

ER -

Securing Personal Input From Individuals Aging with Intellectual Disability: Do Differing Methodologies Produce Equivalent Information?

Abstract

UN SDGs

Keywords

Access to Document

Handle.net

Fingerprint

Cite this