Abstract
Since the beginning of research on the PTB verb agreement, 2nd person marking has posed a persistent problem. Every scholar who has dealt with the problem reconstructs a set of person/number suffixes including 2sg #-n(a). But there is also strong evidence for a #t- prefix which also indexes 2nd person. My purpose in this paper is to summarize the results of a number of descriptions and analyses which have appeared over the last decade or so, which provide new evidence concerning the #t- prefix, and resolve some of the problems which had previously impeded our understanding of this form. I will show that there were two distinct verb forms used for 2nd person reference in PTB. In the final section of the paper I will speculate about the implications of this fact.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 3-33 |
| Journal | Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2014 |
Keywords
- Linguistics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Second person verb forms in Tibeto-Burman'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver