Abstract
This paper begins with a series of questions that highlight the intricate relationship between natural heritage and plant indigeneity. In the Anthropocene - the designation of our current era of anthropogenic climate change impacting negatively on the ecosystems of the planet - what does the future hold for people with well developed and enduring affections for indigenous flora? Conversely, what are the implications of having acutely averse feelings towards the non-indigenous plants of a place - those 'invasive', 'feral' or 'weed' species with which the indigenous (or native) species must often compete for resources? Moreover, how does an unnatural plantscape, consisting of non-native plants, impact, or even deaden, embodied sensory experience and appreciation of a place? Finally, how might the binary categories of natural or unnatural plants cape be defined, in the eyes (and in the noses, and on the tongues and fingers, that is, through the bodies) of community members with longstanding involvements with and emotional attachments to their flora?
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 12-17 |
| Journal | Oral History Australia Journal |
| Issue number | 38 |
| Publication status | Published - 2016 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
Keywords
- Historical Studies
- Literary Studies
- Literary Theory
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Rethinking Botanical Nativism: Oral History, Plant-based Cultural Heritage and the Indigenous-Exotic Binary'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver