Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Resilience of the Prerogative

  • Samuel White

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › Research

Abstract

Determining whether an exercise of constitutional executive power is a manifestation of the royal prerogative or merely a new excuse for executive excess, is notoriously difficult. The royal prerogative remains elusive, notwithstanding a millennium of its exercise. Often its use is viewed as falling on the fringes of government action—honours and awards, the exercise of mercy, or the movement of troops around the country. Other times it has been abridged by statute: either explicitly or implicitly. Yet, its breadth and depth remain potent within modern Australia. This chapter looks to address specifically the oft-referenced and historically well-used prerogative of reading the royal mail as a model for digital resilience. It does so to highlight the residual power that remains in section 61 of the Australian Constitution and to provide a useful case study on the fine line between valid prerogative evolution and invalid expansion of executive power unsanctioned by parliament.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationDigital Resilience
EditorsDale Stephens, Matthew Stubbs, Samuel White
Place of PublicationGateway East, Singapore
Pages147-157
Edition1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Dec 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Resilience of the Prerogative'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this