Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Representing Democracy or Reinforcing Inequality? Electoral Distribution and 'McGinty v Western Australia'

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

'McGinty v Western Australia' is a significant indicator of present and prospective attitudes of the High Court to major issues of representative democracy, such as electoral representation and equality. In affirming by a majority that substantial numerical voter inequality in Western Australian state electorates did not infringe a concept of representative democracy in either the Commonwealth or the Western Australian constitutions, the court went beyond a refusal to overturn AG (Cth); 'Ex Rel McKinlay v Commonwealth' of more than twenty years earlier.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)351-383
JournalFederal Law Review
Volume25
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1997

Keywords

  • Human Rights Law
  • Constitutional Law
  • Legal Institutions (incl. Courts and Justice Systems)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Representing Democracy or Reinforcing Inequality? Electoral Distribution and 'McGinty v Western Australia''. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this