Abstract
'McGinty v Western Australia' is a significant indicator of present and prospective attitudes of the High Court to major issues of representative democracy, such as electoral representation and equality. In affirming by a majority that substantial numerical voter inequality in Western Australian state electorates did not infringe a concept of representative democracy in either the Commonwealth or the Western Australian constitutions, the court went beyond a refusal to overturn AG (Cth); 'Ex Rel McKinlay v Commonwealth' of more than twenty years earlier.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 351-383 |
| Journal | Federal Law Review |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Publication status | Published - 1997 |
Keywords
- Human Rights Law
- Constitutional Law
- Legal Institutions (incl. Courts and Justice Systems)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Representing Democracy or Reinforcing Inequality? Electoral Distribution and 'McGinty v Western Australia''. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver