Abstract
The theme for this conference is 'The Limits of the Law'. In the conference call for papers, some questions that were raised including questions of whether it is appropriate or possible to regulate in the area of health law, and whether 'laws can be flexible but still effective?' Medical end-of-life decisions have been the subject of varying degrees of regulation ranging from 'Natural Death' type legislation that is intended to give effect to people's wishes as they approach the end of life, to the more comprehensive 'Consent to Medical Treatment and Palliative Care Act 1995 (SA)' and our only experiment with euthanasia in the 'Rights of the Terminally Ill Act 1995 (NT)'. All of these attempts to regulate medical end-of-life decisions have had their limitations, both in the types of decisions that they regulate, and the degree of intrusion into the doctor/patient relationship.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Publication status | Published - 2000 |
| Event | ABA/AIHLE 2000: Australasian Bioethics Association and Australian Institute Of Health Law And Ethics Conference - Sydney, Australia Duration: 5 Jul 2000 → 9 Jul 2000 |
Conference
| Conference | ABA/AIHLE 2000: Australasian Bioethics Association and Australian Institute Of Health Law And Ethics Conference |
|---|---|
| City | Sydney, Australia |
| Period | 5/07/00 → 9/07/00 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Criminal Law and Procedure
- Law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Regulating Medical End-of-life decisions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver