Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Reducing weed biomass by burning and grazing can adversely affect frogs

Deborah S Bower, Leonie E Valentine, Anthony C Grice, Lin Schwarzkopf

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

The impacts of weed management on native biodiversity are often overlooked. Burning and grazing plots of land, in isolation and in combination, were used to experimentally reduce the biomass of introduced para grass (Urochloa mutica (Forssk.) T.Q.Nguyen)) in a North Queensland wetland. Frogs were monitored to assess the impact of these management trials. Marbled frogs (Limnodynastes convexiusculus Macleay) declined in response to all management treatments, and their abundance was correlated with vegetation biomass. The abundance of spotted marsh frogs (Limnodynastes tasmaniensis Günther) was not related to weed control treatments, but was influenced by the distance of the experimental plot from the nearest woodland. The decline of these frog species in response to management trials indicates that knowledge about impacts of planned weed control is critical, to inform management of taxa that may be affected.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication15th Australian Weeds Conference Papers and Proceedings: Managing Weeds in a Changing Climate
EditorsC Preston, J H Watts, N D Crossman
Place of PublicationTorrens Park, Australia
PublisherWeed Management Society of South Australia
Pages831-834
ISBN (Print)9780646463445, 0646463446
Publication statusPublished - 2006
Event15AWC: 15th Australian Weeds Conference - Adelaide, Australia
Duration: 24 Sept 200628 Sept 2006

Conference

Conference15AWC: 15th Australian Weeds Conference
CityAdelaide, Australia
Period24/09/0628/09/06

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 15 - Life on Land
    SDG 15 Life on Land

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reducing weed biomass by burning and grazing can adversely affect frogs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this