Abstract
This article explores a controversial claim by the Commonwealth Attorney-General that counter-terrorism legislation is justified by reference to the obligations of governments to ensure their citizens' human security, which, in tum, is suggested to flow from article 3 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). As the title suggests, the article focuses upon and analyses the views of the Attorney-General (the one Australian) and two Canadians influential in the field of human security, as the Attorney-General's particular assertions regarding human security and human rights have been articulated and advanced by citing the writings of these two Canadians, Irwin Cotler and Louise Arbour.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-41 |
| Journal | Australian Year Book of International Law |
| Volume | 25 |
| Publication status | Published - 2006 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Human Rights Law
- Constitutional Law
- International Law (excl. International Trade Law)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Reconstituting 'Human Security' in a New Security Environment: One Australian, Two Canadians and Article 3 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver