Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Realism

Drew M Khlentzos

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingEntry for encyclopedia/dictionary

Abstract

To some, Australian realism and Australian materialism are one and the same. However in contrast to 'Australian materialism', the term 'Australian realism' connotes an attitude as much as a doctrine: a no-nonsense approach to a cluster of tangled philosophical questions issuing in a blend of common-sense realism, scientific realism and materialism. In fact, realism and materialism are not the same. There is no reason why metaphysical realism or its specification as 'common-sense' realism should commit its adherents to scientific realism. Nor is there any reason why realism should assume a materialist form. Still less that a no-nonsense approach to science, metaphysics and mind should inevitably result in commitment to either realism or materialism. That one still encounters the three doctrines confounded is largely the result of a historical contingency: that the powerful intellects and personalities that shaped the small community of Australasian philosophy all happened to be forceful advocates of realism both metaphysical and scientific, and also of materialism.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationA Companion to Philosophy in Australia and New Zealand
EditorsGraham Oppy, NN Trakakis
Place of PublicationMelbourne, Australia
PublisherMonash University Publishing
Pages483-487
Edition1
ISBN (Print)9780980651201, 9780980651218
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Keywords

  • Philosophy of Language
  • Philosophy of Mind (excl Cognition)
  • Metaphysics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Realism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this